Democracy and the Climate Crisis

Does democracy inhibit climate change mitigation?

The debate on democracy and climate mitigation has some arguing that democracy’s deliberations might prevent decisive climate action, while others argue that democracy’s increased political access and more complete deliberation could lead to better climate mitigation. A recent analysis of 127 countries across 22 years found that none of the four key principles of democracy (electoral democracy, liberal democracy, deliberative democracy, and participatory democracy) affect per capita CO2 emissions. However, GDP and low income inequality both increased CO2 emissions. The authors conclude that democratic principles don’t inhibit climate mitigation action, but note a possible tradeoff between fighting climate change and reducing inequality.

Citizen Support for Environmental Protections at Home and Abroad

In an increasingly interconnected world of business corporations, the costs and consequences of climate change require reduction and mitigation efforts across national borders. Recent research with over 3,000 Swiss participants tested citizens' support for approaches to regulating climate-impacting domestic businesses. It showed that citizens are willing to support policies restraining domestic businesses to protect environmental interests both at home and abroad, regardless of whether the other countries are applying similar policies on their own corporations. The research also finds that reminding people about international norms for ethical business activity increases citizen support for policy action. Collectively, this research shows the potential for citizen activism and direct democracy in combating the climate crisis.

Do you have a study we should share for a future Facty Friday? Send an email to drg.el@usaid.gov!”